+44 (20) 8088-5705

   

Problems we solve · Programme rescue

The programme is in trouble. The status report is showing green.

Milestones slip.

Costs rise.

Internal recovery attempts have not restored confidence.

You’re on the umpteenth get-to-green plan…

… and the board needs answers you can’t find, let alone give.

What’s Really Happening

Projects and programmes can get into difficulty for numerous reasons – getting things moving again can seem hard to impossible.

When a new get-to-green plan has to be created every few weeks, the instinct can be to add resource, accelerate reporting, or bring in a bigger team. It rarely works. What’s usually missing is clarity on goals, knowing which constraints are binding, and whether the original scope is still the right scope.

A 20-minute conversation. No pitch.

01 / Recognition

You may be hearing yourself say…

01

“We need an independent view before the next board decision.”

02

“The reports don’t reflect what people doing the work are telling us.”

03

“Recovery plans keep moving the date without resolving the blockers.”

04

“Does the original scope still make commercial sense?”

This work needs a genuine sponsor and access to evidence. If the need is additional delivery capacity on an unchanged plan, that should be established before proposing a rescue intervention.

The focus here is a specific project or programme and its immediate recovery decisions. A stalled transformation may require broader changes to the organisation’s priorities and operating model than just one stalled project or programme.

02 / Diagnosis

Recovery needs a position people can act on

Simply moving the dates to get-to-green again won’t make things more productive and may even create resentment later on.

The Central Problem

Leadership needs a credible view of remaining value, cost, risk, and feasibility.

A plan that avoids difficult decisions cannot provide it.

01

Recovery means adding more

Extra people and reporting are introduced before anyone establishes which constraints they would resolve.

02

Reported status and operational reality diverge

Confidence rests on milestones that no longer represent the work or the risk remaining.

03

Scope and commitments remain unchallenged

Assumptions survive because changing them needs decisions about value, money, and accountability.

04

No owner for the difficult trade-offs

Sponsors, delivery teams and suppliers work around unresolved choices, increasing the cost of delay.

The first decision is whether the remaining case for the programme justifies the next commitment.

03 / Intervention

Establish the position. Make the decision. Support the recovery.

We don’t arrive with a framework, a reorganisation, or a replacement programme. We start by establishing what is actually happening, then put the evidence in front of you.

01

Independent assessment

We compare reported status with delivery evidence, scope, dependencies and the remaining business case. You get a written assessment of the position, uncertainties and options for the sponsor and board.

02

Reset direction and accountability

We help the appropriate decision-makers choose a course: recover, narrow, restart or stop. We make the consequences, decision owners and conditions for proceeding explicit.

03

Work to reviewable outcomes

If recovery is agreed, we support fortnightly outcomes, remove identified blockers and establish reporting that reflects progress and risk. We might use flow analysis or Cost of Delay where useful. Direct recovery leadership, if required, is scoped explicitly.

The objective is a programme its own leadership can control or a defensible decision to stop investing in it.

05 / Evidence

What this looks like in practice

Case Study

From no items delivered in 12 months to Programme Flow in 3

SETL Development Ltd

SETL were developing a Transfer Agency on Blockchain hosted on multiple Cloud platforms for the European Asset Management sector.

Programme resets had become a weekly norm, as had lack of delivery – no features or releases had occurred for over 12 months. The problems came down to mismatched priorities, a bottleneck in testing, too many meetings, and a fear of talking to high-level stakeholders about issues before they became serious blockers.

After an initial review, the first step in the intervention was to review the shape and structure of the programme over a three-week period with stakeholders in Europe and the UK; then, based on the evidence, to introduce a standardised priority mechanism, cull over 70% of meetings, and establish regular playback sessions with the customer. After a further two months, work was flowing again and the programme was able to rebaseline from a position of knowledge.

See also – Insurance Digital Transformation: from chaos to delivery confidence

Client Perspective

“Toby identified issues with the programme immediately. Within two months the work was flowing again and we were back on track.

“We had to have some grown up conversations but it was really worth it.”


NP

Chief Technology Officer

Additional Sector Experience

Capital markets · Insurance · Fintech · EV charging · Telecoms · Data centres

06 / FAQ

Questions people ask

How fast can you start?

We confirm availability and the earliest useful start once we understand the urgency, access required, and scope. We do not promise a start date before that conversation. A short assessment also depends on timely access to the people and evidence involved.

Will you tell us to stop the programme?

Yes, if the evidence supports that recommendation. We set out the reasoning and alternatives for the sponsor and board. The decision remains yours; our role is to make it informed and explicit.

Do you take over delivery?

Where appropriate, we can scope direct leadership of the recovery phase. Every engagement is founder-led, with specialist help brought in as required. Responsibilities, authority, and the point of handover to your leadership are agreed before that work starts.

What about our existing delivery partner or PMO?

We work with their knowledge of the programme while forming an independent view of the evidence and options. We clarify responsibilities and decision rights with the sponsor so the recovery does not create another competing layer of governance.

Is the diagnostic fee fixed?

The diagnostic scope and baseline fee are agreed before we start. Any recovery phase is then scoped around agreed outcomes and dependencies.

How are your engagements priced?

We combine a baseline fee with payments linked to agreed outcomes. This creates commitment on both sides while keeping the commercial focus on results rather than activity.
If we miss an agreed outcome through our own fault, we put it right. Where delivery depends on information, decisions, or commitments from your organisation, those dependencies and their commercial implications are agreed upfront.
We can also consider bespoke arrangements, including fees linked to measurable savings or other commercial benefits.

07 / Next Step

Tell us what’s stuck

A 20-minute call with Toby Corballis about your situation. Not a pitch, a demo, or a discovery call delegated to someone junior.

We’ll follow up with a short written view of what we’ve heard and where we’d look first.

There’s no proposal unless you ask for one, and “not now” is a perfectly good outcome.

Prefer email? [email protected]

Or call +44 (20) 8088-5705